I wrote about this a month ago, but it happened again yesterday. There we were playing, in the waning light of an early spring afternoon, and I discovered that I had accidentally put my queen in a place where she was actually trapped by Graham's pawns. All he had to do was move one pawn and there was nothing I could do, I'd have to trade my queen for a bishop. Not a good trade.
And I felt actual shame and fear: oh my God, I thought, my queen, how could I do this. So I resorted to subterfuge, I moved some things around on other places of the board and distracted Graham so he didn't realize the opportunity that he had. And I got out of it.
Again, in retrospect, I could have shown him how much power and opportunity he had, but the drive to win was too strong.
I shared about this in an AA meeting this morning, and several people identified, including a grandmother who had recently been playing chess with her granddaughter and had a similar thing go on, she was overcome by the lust for battle and dominance. The very nice male-to-female trans-person who sits in the corner came over to me and said that she plays and coaches some chess and that actually I should not let Graham win, that he would know and it is demeaning to him. I was glad to have that vote of confidence.
But the shocking thing is, of course, the actual fear I felt at putting my queen in a stupid situation. It is not, in essence, dissimilar to the hypertrophied level of commitment that drove me to foil a goal-scoring opportunity in a soccer game last September -- and thereby sprain my hand pretty badly. I'm still not 100% healed.
The question is: why do I care? and should I?
Sunday, March 29, 2015
On teaching chess to Graham
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment