Unlike most of the rest of the world, I haven't written that much this cycle about the upcoming elections. In some ways, I haven't done as much. We canvassed just once. But we did do a pretty big fundraiser and I have contributed more in aggregate than I have to any other election cycle, I think. Certainly more than I have in years Josh wasn't running for something.
In some ways my lower degree of engagement reflects the fact that I'm feeling a little more tired than I have in recent years. Relative to the French, certainly, I have an aggregate vacation deficit that has built up over the years and it has begun to weigh on me. Though it's not always apparent to the naked eye how hard I'm working, and I do lay stupid things on myself like my Duolingo daily quota. And a blog quota.
I do sincerely wish that the Democrats have a good night tonight, but it's much less because I think that the generic Democratic agenda is right in every way. A local politician, someone I respect a lot and who works his butt off, sent out an email recently about the "failure of neoliberal policies" over a long time frame and arguing for a return of a more "progressive" policy agenda. The day before, in the the book on financial history I'm listening to, the author implied, without going into a great degree of detail, that Johnson's Great Society had caused a lot of harm to the US's fiscal balance. There's some truth to both of these assertions, and either of them could and has been subject to book length treatments. But at this point in my life I feel more aligned with the latter than the former statement, though I love the guy who said the former.
One thing that's clear is that the Trump and his populist techno-ego-kleptocracy must go. Can we safely make it out the other side to a place where people don't get sucked into rage-driven susceptibility to populist flim-flammery? That's another question.