There were some surprises.
First, from the perspective of musical form, he doesn't seem to think of either Mozart or Beethoven as huge innovators. Bach, yes, to be sure, but not the two that we most often think of as the big boys. He gives them credit for changing the status of the composer in the world and how composers could earn a living, making them more self-sustaining than vassals of this or that court or patron, but not much else. Maybe he's right.
There's barely any mention of Schubert, Hayden, Chopin. I guess six hours just isn't a lot when you've got a lot of ground to cover.
Also, he spends a good chunk of time talking about how Liszt was really the innovative one and that so much of what Wagner did just derives from innovation done by Liszt. To which I'm like, OK, don't really have a dog in that fight. But Goodall clearly does.
Anyhoo, it was six hours well spent. I learned a lot. I have more of a timeline in mind now for the history of music, which is what I was after. I did snooze a little on my couch while listening/watching, but then again that's what couches are for. Onward.
No comments:
Post a Comment